The Reproducibility Project, Open Science Framework, and Center for Open Science have received public attention from a variety of scientific and popular news outlets including:

1. Science (March 30, 2012): Psychology's Bold Initiative
2. Chronicle of Higher Education (April 17, 2012): Is Psychology About to Come Undone?
3. Nature (May 16, 2012): Replication Studies: Bad Copy
4. Science (8/30/2012): Service Offers to Reproduce Results for a Fee
5. Econtalk, podcast interview with Brian Nosek about the Reproducibility Project and related issues (September 10, 2012): Nosek on Truth, Science, and Academic Incentives
6. Chronicle of Higher Education (October 5, 2012): Danny Kahneman sees train-wreck looming for social psychology
7. Open Science Summit (October 19, 2012); Video of Elizabeth Bartmess, Michael Cohn, and Jeff Spies presentations. Bartmess/Cohn starts at 55:00 and Spies starts at 1:15:00.
8. Science (December 7, 2012): Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole
9. New Yorker (December 24, 2012): Cleaning up science
10. The Atlantic (December 20, 2012): The myth of self-correcting science
11. APA Monitor (February, 2013): Interesting results: Can they be replicated?
12. NBC News (Februrary 20, 2013): Scandals for psychologists to do some soul-searching
13. Huffington Post (February 20, 2013): The crisis in squishy science: Trouble for scientists and for journalists
14. New York Times (February 24, 2013): Primed for controversy
15. Pacific Standard Magazine (February 26, 2013): Replicate This
16. Chronicle for Higher Education (March 5, 2013): New center hopes to clean up sloppy science and bogus research (not our favorite title)
17. Science Magazine (March 5, 2013): Psychologists launch a bare-all research initiative (closer to our favorite title)
18. National Geographic: Not Exactly Rocket Science (March 5, 2013): New center aims to make science more open and reliable
19. New Yorker (April 30, 2013): The Crisis in Social Psychology That Isn't